Mutual Exchange Symposium: Anarchy and Democracy
I was pleased to coordinate and announce the June 2017 Mutual Exchange Symposium on Anarchy and Democracy, as originally published at the Center for a Stateless Society.
Mutual Exchange is the Center for a Stateless Society’s effort to achieve mutual understanding through dialogue. Following one of the most divisive Presidential elections in recent U.S. American history and a dangerous victor’s contested ascension to power, the political climate is one of intense ideological strife and disagreement. There is no better time to refocus at least some of our efforts on respectful and mutually beneficial discourse. Periodically delving into the weeds of complex theoretical topics to collaboratively experiment with ideas is not only necessary for individual and collective intellectual progress, but is part and parcel of anarchist praxis itself.
“Fighting over the definitions of words can sometimes seem like a futile and irrelevant undertaking. However, it’s important to note that whatever language gets standardized in our communities shapes what we can talk and think about,” says William Gillis in his lead essay of our June symposium. Indeed, rather than pointless “infighting” and social posturing, the Center for a Stateless Society hopes to create a platform for free expression that benefits authors and readers alike by productively clarifying our values and principles.
Whether or not any sort of resolution, consensus, or agreement results from our ensuing dialogue is, perhaps ironically, not the point. Ten anarchist authors have chosen to participate in an in-depth examination of the idea of “democracy” and how it relates to anarchy. I hope they are able to develop, advance, and popularize their individual ideas, but also set a standard for productive, yet diverse debate that is sorely needed right now.
Combining the Greek words demos (“common people”) and kratos (“strength”), democracy means “rule of the commoners.” The philosophical and political debates surrounding democracy extend back 2500 years to Ancient Athens. For much of recent history, many people consider democracy to be a cherished value to protect and spread across the globe, while many others see it as a privilege they hope to someday enjoy. Even others, from all over the political spectrum, see democracy as an enemy to be squashed.
This C4SS Mutual Exchange Symposium will explore what anarchists have to say about democracy. What is the historical relationship between democracy and anarchy? Is democracy always entwined with the state? What should anarchists think of democratic government? What are truly democratic values and how do they relate to anarchist values? How does democracy relate to market exchange and social organization? How should those interested in social change view democracy? How do causes like feminism, anti-racism, anti-colonialism, anti-imperialism, and anti-capitalism relate to democracy?
It is no secret that a President Trump is reigniting debates surrounding democracy and democratic values among many commentators. What will a Trump presidency mean for democracy around the world and how should anarchists react? Moving forward in the 21st century it is imperative that we get to the roots of these nuanced debates so that we are better prepared to build the new world in the shell of the old, while also staying afloat in the stormy seas of authoritarianism, political violence, turbulent geopolitical alliances, and genocide.
The June C4SS Mutual Exchange Symposium features the Center’s own William Gillis, Kevin Carson, Nathan Goodman, and Grayson English in addition to Shawn Wilbur, Wayne Price, Alexander Reid Ross, Gabriel Amadej, Derek Wittorff, and Jessica Flanagan. Every day this month the Center will publish another entry in our ongoing conversation from one of the ten authors fleshing out their thoughts regarding the above questions and issues. Some essays will remain stand-alone contributions while others will provide back-and-forth commentary between multiple authors.
I look forward to seeing these prolific and nuanced writers hash out all their points of disagreement as well as agreement and hope you stay with the Center throughout the entire month to gain both theoretical and practical insights from our symposium.
Before the exchange kicks off tomorrow, June 2nd, here are some preliminary texts and resources related to the longstanding anarchist debate on democracy that I hope are useful going forward:
The Anarchist Critique of Democracy – CrimethInc.
Are Anarchism and Democracy Opposed? A Response to CrimethInc. – Wayne Price
Against Democracy – Coordination of Anarchist Groups
Neither Democrats nor Dictators: Anarchists – Errico Malatesta
An Anarchist Critique of Democracy – Moxie Marlinspike and Windy Hart
Democracy is Direct – Cindy Milstein
Occupy and Anarchism’s Gift of Democracy – David Graeber
Direct Action, Anarchism, Direct Democracy – David Graeber
Down With the Law! – Libertad
Anarchy and Democracy – Robert Graham
The Mutual Exchange Symposium:
The Abolition Of Rulership Or The Rule Of All Over All — William Gillis
Democracy, Anarchy, & Freedom — Wayne Price
Democracy: Self-Government or Systemic Powerlessness? — Derek Wittorff
The Linguistics of Democracy — Alexander Reid Ross
Anarchy and Democracy: Examining the Divide — Shawn P. Wilbur
On Democracy as a Necessary Anarchist Value — Kevin Carson
The Regime of Liberty — Gabriel Amadej
Demolish the Demos — Grayson English
Anarchism as Radical Liberalism: Radicalizing Markets, Radicalizing Democracy — Nathan Goodman
Politics and Anarchist Ideals — Jessica Flanagan
Response to Goodman — William Gillis
Embracing the Antinomies — Shawn P. Wilbur
Formality, Collectivity and Anarchy — Derek Wittorff
Response to Wittorff — William Gillis
Individualist Anarchism vs. Social Anarchism — Wayne Price
Comments on the Other Lead Essays — Kevin Carson
Response to Carson — William Gillis
Reply to Kevin Carson and William Gillis — Derek Wittorff
Further Response on Democratic Anarchism — Wayne Price
Social, but Still Not Democratic — Shawn P. Wilbur
Reply to Alexander Reid Ross — William Gillis
Response to Shawn Wilbur and Gabriel Amadej — Wayne Price
Anarchism Without Anarchy — Shawn P. Wilbur
Non-Coercive Collective Decision Making: A Quaker Perspective — Robert Kirchner
A Last Response to Shawn Wilbur — Wayne Price
Antinomies of Democracy — Shawn P. Wilbur
